As many homes in Coffs Harbour are flooded because of an intense rain depression we need also to examine the affect of sea rise.
We also must stop building in flood affected areas. Councils must stop approving development in flood affected areas. It is ridiculous to see new buildings flooded to their roofs. Insurance companies may pay for a while but not without future higher payment rates. In the end every taxpayer pays.
• We are looking more and more unlikely to prevent severe global heating. • Scientists are predicting the melting of the ice covering Greenland with a subsequent sea level rise of 7m. • This rise does not factor in sea rise from the melting of Antarctica and other ice. • Already many properties are likely to flood when a high tide is
combined with high local rainfall. What were a hundred year rainfall events are
now ten year events. • The frequency of high
rainfall events will increase with global heating and more and more
severe hurricanes are predicted because of warmer seas. • Low coastal areas will be subjected to severe storm surges. • Would you buy a property likely to be inundated in twenty years, fifty years, a hundred years? Many wouldn't. Even the perception of possible inundation will greatly affect property values. • When certain properties are in less demand their value falls. • Would you buy a property with a value likely to fall? • The view of Coffs Harbour above shows areas likely to be inundated by a 7m sea level rise. • Property above a 10m rise will become highly sought after and will greatly rise in value. Learn more about how sea rise inundation will affect Australian property. Click here to go to Coastal Risk Australia site
"The president-elect has said he would require
publicly traded companies to disclose emissions and financial risks
associated with global warming.
The White House may not be preparing to transition to a Biden administration, but Wall Street is.
While
President Trump and other Republican leaders continue to dispute the
election results, the financial sector is moving ahead with plans to
begin the transition to a carbon-free economy and acknowledge a new
administration that’s eager to tackle the climate crisis.
Investors
are increasingly putting their money into funds geared toward either
excluding the fossil fuel industry entirely, or underweighting
high-carbon companies in their mix.
A
growing number of major banks and other money managers have committed
to net-zero emissions by 2050 and have pledged to disclose
exactly how
their finances contribute to climate change, as well as which of their
assets are at risk from its impacts. And last week, the U.S. Federal Reserve said
for the first time that failing to address climate change would put the
nation’s finances at risk and its economy at a global disadvantage.
For
years, analysts have been saying that the global economy is shifting
away from fossil fuels and toward renewable energy, with or without the
United States. Clean energy saw an expansion this year despite a global
drop in energy demand because of the pandemic, the International Energy Agency said last week, and renewables are likely to expand nearly 50 percent by 2025.
Now,
as President-elect Joe Biden prepares to take office in January, global
finance leaders are again calling on the United States to provide some
kind of federal guidance for companies in regard to climate change,
especially as other parts of the world begin taking major regulatory
action.
Last week, the United Kingdom announced
that within five years, all major companies and financial institutions
doing business in the country would be required to measure and disclose
their climate risks and greenhouse gas emissions—a move met with wide
support from the financial industry."
High-tide floodwaters in downtown Annapolis on April 4, 2017. Credit: City of Annapolis
"It was a sight you don’t normally see: a jellyfish lying dead in the
middle of a parking lot partly submerged in water. But this was no
ordinary parking lot. This particular section of asphalt in downtown
Annapolis, Maryland, is among a growing number of areas prone to
frequent flooding in the seaside town. The jellyfish had slipped in from
the Chesapeake Bay through an opening in the seawall.
“You can literally kayak from the bay right into this parking lot,”
said NOAA oceanographer William Sweet on the September day that we
visited. The tide was relatively low that day.
On days with the highest tides of the year, whole parking lots and
streets in Annapolis are underwater, causing delays and traffic
congestion. Compromise Street, a major road into town, is often forced
to shut down, slowing response times for firefighters and other first
responders. Local businesses have lost as much as $172,000 a year, or
1.4% of their annual revenue, due to high-tide floods, according to a
study published in 2019 in the journal Science Advances.
High-tide floods, also known as nuisance floods, sunny-day floods,
and recurrent tidal floods, occur “when tides reach anywhere from 1.75
to 2 feet above the daily average high tide and start spilling onto
streets or bubbling up from storm drains,” according to an annual report on the subject
by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA.) These
floods are usually not related to storms; they typically occur during
high tides, and they impact people’s lives. Because of rising seas
driven by climate change, the frequency of this kind of flood has
dramatically increased in recent years.".... By Jenny Marder,
NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
"Our essays in this series have presented compelling scientific
evidence about the warming of the planet, reviewed the evidence that
human activity is its principal cause, and discussed the resulting
economic and environmental damages.
Now comes the question of what we are going to do about it. The options are clear:
– Nations can work toward eliminating greenhouse gas emissions and reducing the scale of future warming.
– Governments and private actors can, and will, invest in measures to
protect home and livelihood from effects of changes that cannot be
prevented.
– Or human societies and natural ecosystems will suffer the severe harms of inaction.
The more they (really we) do now and in the near future, the smaller
will be the residual damages imposed on ourselves, our children, and our
grandchildren. The choice is ours.
The suffering is already here, of course. In some places, it is almost impossible to bear despite growing investments in adaptation. So what is missing? A commitment to emissions reductions appropriate to the special nature
of the climate change threat. Fortunately, with a smart choice of
policy measures, the emissions control challenge can still be met at a
tolerable economic cost."
"Author Chris Goodall says tackling the climate crisis is neither difficult nor expensive and can help boost the economy
Illustration: Guardian Design
Net
zero. It’s a simple enough concept – the notion that we reduce carbon
emissions to a level where we are no longer adding to the stock in the
atmosphere. More and more companies and countries are taking the pledge, promising to hit net zero by 2050, 2030 or even sooner.
But it is easier said than done. Industrial processes remain carbon
intensive, as do agriculture and aviation. Even the sudden economic halt
brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic this year will result in a mere
downward blip in global greenhouse gas emissions.
The sharp decline in energy use at the beginning of the pandemic has
not persisted. Government stimulus programmes have done little to
prioritise green projects – barely 1% of the funds made available around
the world will target climate crisis mitigation. Hopes that the virus would push us into radical action to reduce emissions have proved illusory.
This may make us pessimistic about the future – but that would be a
mistake. The last six months have seen a growing realisation around the
world that fully decarbonising our societies is technically possible,
relatively cheap and potentially of major benefit to society, and
particularly to less prosperous sectors.
A sensible portfolio of actions could reduce emissions, provide jobs and
improve living standards in forgotten parts of the UK. It won’t be
completely painless, but this nine-step plan can transform much of the
British economy." ...
...................................
...."9. Carbon tax
Lastly, we should try to bring the reluctant oil and gas industries
onside by instituting a tax on the production of anything that results
in carbon emissions. Rarely in the past have businesses asked to be more
heavily taxed. But today almost all large fossil fuel companies are
pleading for a carbon levy that provides the necessary incentive for
them to wean themselves off extracting oil and gas.
Fighting
the causes and consequences of the climate emergency is neither
particularly difficult or expensive. The net impact on jobs and living
standards will be strongly positive. The programme will require
direction from central government, and probably an effective carbon tax,
alongside a willingness to hand over some powers to local authorities.
Perhaps this is the most contentious part of the programme I propose:
the idea that Whitehall should recognise both that the free market
needs some assistance when it comes to the climate crisis, and that
devolution of real power to towns and cities could be beneficial to
everybody."
• Chris Goodall is an author and environmentalist whose latest book, What We Need To Do Now, assesses
the steps needed to build a low-carbon world and was shortlisted for
the Wainwright Prize. He writes a weekly newsletter on low carbon
progress around the world, available at www.carboncommentary.com.
"Australia has seen the latest extraordinary twist in its climate soap
opera. An alliance of business and environment groups declared the
nation is “woefully unprepared” for climate change and urgent action is
needed.
And yesterday, Australian Industry Group – one of the alliance members – called on the federal government to spend at least A$3.3 billion on renewable energy over the next decade.
The alliance, known as the Australian Climate Roundtable, formed in 2015.
It comprises ten business and environmental bodies, including the
Business Council of Australia, National Farmers
Federation and the
Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU).
There is no systemic government response (federal, state and local)
to build resilience to climate risks. Action is piecemeal;
uncoordinated; does not engage business, private sector investment,
unions, workers in affected industries, community sector and
communities; and does not match the scale of the threat climate change
represents to the Australian economy, environment and society.
Drought
This is ironic, since many of the statement’s signatories spent decades fiercely resisting moves towards sane climate policy. Let’s look back at a few pivotal moments."
"Some Ages Have World Wars. Others Have Moonshots. Our Great Challenge is Preventing the Collapse of Civilization.
Let me explain what I mean by “accelerating pulsation of disaster.” Take the example of California’s wildfires. They’re the direct result
of climate change. Hotter temperatures, hotter oceans, bigger storms,
more lightning, drier vegetation — bang! A near certainty of historic
fires igniting."
Wildfire emergency
"So California’s burning…again. Just
like it was last year, and the year before that, and so on. In a few
months, it’ll be Australia’s turn to be hit by megafires, all over
again. They’ll be worse than last year, at least if we average it all
over a decade or so. That’s because, of course, fire is seasonal. And as
we head into the age of catastrophe, “megafire season” will become a
part of our lives. The world will develop Fire Belts, of which
California and Australia are becoming a part."
"Then there are Flood Belts. While the pandemic raged, much of Asia flooded. The West didn’t take much notice — even though China’s largest dam is now at it’s limits.
And yet the megafloods Asia just experienced are just like megafires —
natural phenomena that are getting worse on a seasonal, yearly cycle.
Within a decade or two, these floods will also threaten habitability.
Expect much greater sea level rise as land-ice melts
...................................
"Are
you beginning to get what I mean by “accelerating pulsation of
disaster” yet? As we head into the age of catastrophe, a new range of
calamities will become our dismal new normal. They’ll recur, in cycles.
Only each time the cycle spins, they’ll get worse and worse. Megafires,
megafloods, pandemics, extinctions."
Sea Rise will flood cities
................................................
The accelerating pulsation of disaster. Life
is going to feel scary, strange, dislocating, anxiety-inducing. As soon
as this disaster ebbs — phew, the megafire’s over! — here comes another
one. Now it’s megaflood season. Now it’s Covid season. Christ, now
there’s a new pandemic. What the? You and I were born live at the very
tail end of a golden age of human stability. That age is now over, and
the transition into the age of apocalypse is going to feel deeply
frightening. 2020 was just the beginning. It’s going to get much, much
worse, before — if — it ever gets better.
Melting Land ice on Greenland
As all
those cycles of catastrophe, operating at annual, semiannual, decadal
scales get worse and worse, ultimately, our systems will begin to
buckle, and then break. Faster and harder than we think.
Think of California right about now. A wildfire is bad. A respiratory pandemic is really bad. But megafires during a respiratory pandemic? What now? They have conflicting objectives: quarantine and stay at home, versus evacuate and firefight."
........................
Heatwaves kill
"They then face a stark dilemma. To
fight accelerating waves of natural calamity, fire, flood, drought,
famine, then saps resources that are needed to invest in tomorrow. We
fight that megafire, we try to build a barrier against tomorrow’s mega
flood. There go all those schools, hospitals, universities, libraries,
parks, roads, high-speed trains we wanted to build, expand, renew.
Simply fending off catastrophe will take a larger and large share of our resources. That
leaves less left over to invest in the things which really improve
people’s quality of life, whether healthcare, education, retirement, and
so on.
What happens as a result of that? Well, people’s qualities of life fall. Depression and frustration and unhappiness grow. And the predictable consequence of that is more extremism. Discontented masses tend to turn to demagogues, who blame all of a society’s problems on hated minorities. The age of catastrophe will be a boon to tomorrow’s Trumps.
And yet even all this just takes to about the mid 2030s or so. After that? That’s when the real fireworks begin."
"By about then, the limits of our civilization’s fundamental systems will have been breached.
Insurance and banking systems won’t be able to cover the losses of
burning states and flooded cities. They’ll go bankrupt, and probably
demand huge bailouts. Those bankruptcies will have a devastating
consequence. Not just the lack of credit, but a sharp rise in the cost
of it. Translation, you’re probably living in debt right now — whether
mortgage, credit card debt, car loans, student debt, medical debt, or
all of the above — and the interest rates on all that are going to
skyrocket. Somebody has to pay for the risk and costs of all this sudden
catastrophe. And it’s probably going to be you, in the hidden form of
paying massively more interest on all that debt you already can’t pay off."
Properties will become uninsurable
As
insurance and financial systems go broke, and the costs of accessing
money and credit spike, huge waves of businesses will close. Most small
businesses exist on razor-thin margins, from restaurants and bars to
nail salons and hobby shops. When their rents double and the interest on
their loans triples and they can’t get any more credit — at exactly the
same time as their customer base is falling apart? Bang! They go broke,
too. And all the millions of people they employ — small businesses are still the heart of the economy — are unemployed. The cycle of depression and poverty accelerates."
"This is not a drill, my friends. It’s
time to stop acting like it is, burying our pretty vacant little heads
in Netflix-and-chill and Instagram envy and the latest gender pronoun
and Fakebook friends. That’s all, history will rightly say, garbage for
the human mind and spirit. This is it. We’re not going to get another chance." "
"Efforts to keep the Amazon rainforest
standing and reduce Brazil’s planet-warming emissions are being hampered
by budget cuts for the country’s environmental watchdog and its main
climate change programme, researchers have said.
Brazil has
seen a sharp spike in deforestation under the right-wing government of
President Jair Bolsonaro, with less than half the forest inspectors it
had a decade ago and the COVID-19 pandemic spreading rapidly across the
Amazon region.
Compared with 2019, the first five months of 2020
registered a
Amazon deforestration: Climate Change News com
substantial drop in government spending on forest
inspection activities carried out by the Brazilian Institute of
Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (Ibama).
For January
to May 2019, the amount allocated was R$17.4 million ($3.24 million),
against R$5.3 million so far in 2020, according to figures provided by
the Institute of Socioeconomic Studies (INESC), a non-profit
organisation that has analysed Brazil’s public budget for more than 30
years.
"Climate change is an economic issue, not a matter of religious
observance, or inner city high fashion. All the ridiculous language of
“belief” and “scepticism” – as if climate science was astrology, or a
cult, or a wellness guru – has been entirely unhelpful to progress.
Labor is fully capable of putting workers at the centre of a plan for
economic transformation which will see carbon-intensive industries scale
back and other more sustainable industries prosper in a low carbon
world.
Katta O'Donnell, 23, is suing the Government over the risks
to her investments through climate change.
(Supplied: Molly Townsend)
A
23-year-old Melbourne law student is suing the Australian Government
for failing to disclose the risk climate change poses to Australians'
super and other safe investments.
Key points:
The
world-first case alleges the Government failed in its duty to disclose
climate change's impact on the value of government bonds
The case is being led by a 23-year-old student and investor who says she did it to "protect her future"
Experts say it could open the floodgates for other litigation by tying climate change to real-world financial risk
The
world-first case filed on Wednesday in the Federal Court alleges the
Government, as well as two government officials, failed in a duty to
disclose how climate change would impact the value of government bonds.
Katta
O'Donnell, the head litigant for the class action suit, said she hoped
the case would change the way Australia handled climate change.
"I'm
suing the Government because I'm 23 [and] I think I need to be aware of
the risks to my money and to the whole of society and the Australian
economy," Ms O'Donnell said.
"I think the Government needs to stop keeping us in the dark so we can be aware of the risks that we're all faced with."
Experts say it is the first where a national government has been sued for its lack of transparency on climate risks.
Government
bonds are considered the safest form of investment, with most
Australians invested in them through compulsory superannuation.
Bonds
are similar to shares, but instead of investing in companies, the
investor lends a government money to build infrastructure and fund
critical services such as health, welfare and national security.
Ms O'Donnell, who has invested in bonds independently from her super, said she did it to "protect her future".
However
bonds, like shares, can lose value if they become less attractive to
the market. This can occur if investors question a government's ability
to repay them due to rising government debt, ethical or reputational
reasons.
Ms O'Donnell said watching the impact of bushfires in Australia made her worry about the value of her bonds.
Despite
the Government not disclosing climate-related risks to its investment
products, government regulators are increasingly forcing companies to
disclose how climate change will impact their shareholders.
APRA is working with corporate
regulator ASIC and the Reserve Bank of Australia to ensure public
companies are examining climate risk, disclosing it to investors, and
acting on it.
Ms O'Donnell's lawyer, David Barnden from Equity Generation Lawyers, said the duty to be transparent extended to the Government.
"We allege that the Government is misleading and deceiving investors by not telling them about the risks," Mr Barnden said.
Experts say the drought and the threat of bushfires
in Australia exposes
the Government
to more financial risk compared to other countries.
New
Zealand climate minister says governments must not just return to the
way things were, and instead plot a new course to ease climate change
James Shaw
James Shaw, New Zealand’s climate change minister, has asked the
country’s independent climate change commission to check whether its
emissions targets under the Paris agreement are enough to limit global
heating to 1.5C. He explains why he’s prioritising the issue during a
strict national lockdown to stop the spread of Covid-19, which could
send New Zealand’s unemployment rate soaring.
To say that we find ourselves in an unprecedented moment is so
obvious and has been so often repeated it’s almost become white noise.
What is less obvious, however, is where we go from here.
In any significant crisis, let alone one as catastrophic as the
Covid-19 pandemic, it is an entirely understandable human reflex to want
things to “return to normal”, to “go back to the way they were before”.
And, when faced with economic headwinds – in recent decades, the
Asian financial crisis, the global financial crisis and, in our own
case, the Christchurch earthquakes) successive governments the world
over have directed their efforts to meeting public expectation and
getting back to business as usual.
Unfortunately, one of the features of business as usual was a highly
polluting and ecologically unsustainable economy on a pathway that was
locking in catastrophic climate change.
Successive responses to economic crises have seen climate change and
the natural environment we depend on for life on Earth as a
nice-to-have, something to think about once we’ve got the economy back
on track and there’s a bit more money to go round.
Steep falls in emissions have been the pandemic’s immediate effect. But what’s needed is a green recovery
So
far, discussions of a coronavirus exit strategy have mainly focused on
the steps that could bring an end to the lockdown. In the short term,
both in the UK and elsewhere, there is nothing more desirable than
letting people resume their lives, once it is safe to do so.
But the speed of the “return to normal” is not the only thing that
matters. The manner in which the world’s leaders manage the colossal
economic and political shocks caused by the virus is also of the utmost
importance. And at the top of their list of priorities, alongside human
welfare, must be the biosphere and its future.
"As
Australia scrambles to avoid its first recession in three decades,
economist Ross Garnaut says it is "exactly the right time" for
government to throw cash into renewable energy infrastructure.
The
global outbreak of COVID-19 has already taken a bite out of tourism,
education and export industries, with the federal government working on a
stimulus package to stave off a recession.
Professor Ross Garnaut says government should be investing in renewable energy. Credit:Louie Douvis
Professor
Garnaut said the country could not avoid sliding into a recession, but
governments could "shape the way we come out of it".
"Even if
there was no disruption in Australia from the virus, what has already
happened to the economies of our major trading partners is deeply
damaging to the Australian economy," he said, speaking at a CEDA lunch
in Brisbane on Wednesday.
"The
pure economics say right now is exactly the right time for major
investment in the industries and infrastructure of the future."
"The high cost of transporting renewable energy overseas made
Australia the perfect candidate to process its own iron, aluminium and
other raw minerals, he said.
"Play it right and Australia has
exceptional opportunities for new areas of prosperity and economic
expansion in the zero-emissions world economy," he said."