Showing posts with label renewable energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label renewable energy. Show all posts

Sunday, 7 June 2020

More jobs in renewable-led COVID-19 economic recovery, EY report finds:ABC

Climate action to protect coral reefs and tourism  #jailclimatecriminals
Cooked coral reefs
A renewables-led economic recovery will create almost three times as many jobs as a fossil-fuel-led recovery, according to a report by economic consultancy Ernst and Young (EY).
The newly published report proposed six focus areas, which it said would simultaneously stimulate the economy and move Australia towards net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, in accordance with the 2015 Paris Agreement.

While the Federal Government has spoken of a "gas-fired" COVID-19 recovery, the EY report, commissioned by conservation group WWF Australia, argues replacing fossil fuels with renewable electricity and hydrogen will be better for the economy. 

"We can rebuild our economy in a way that sets up Australia for prosperity in a world hungry for a low-carbon future," WWF Australia energy transition manager Nicky Ison said.

Friday, 5 June 2020




The Australien Government has made an ad about its Economic Recovery Plan, and it’s surprisingly honest and informative.

 ๐Ÿ‘‰ Take action: https://www.thejuicemedia.com/derp 

๐Ÿ‘‰ Ways you can support us to keep making videos: 

๐Ÿ”น Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/TheJuiceMedia ๐Ÿ”น Tip us on PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/thejuicemedia 

๐Ÿ‘‰ CREDITS ๐Ÿ”น Produced by Patrons of The Juice Media ๐Ÿ”น Written and directed by Giordano for The Juice Media ๐Ÿ”น Performed by Ellen Burbidge x Voice by Lucy ๐Ÿ”น Gas and Volcano animations by Brent Cataldo: https://twitter.com/yahtzio ๐Ÿ”น Script feedback and input: Dbot, Scott, Adso, Damian, Simon ๐Ÿ”น Research Assistance by Rebecca Clarke ๐Ÿ”น Research Assistance by Mara, Megan & Cam @ Friends of the Earth ๐Ÿ”น Music by TwinsMusic: https://audiojungle.net/item/upbeat-i... ๐Ÿ”น Outro music by Triple7Music: https://audiojungle.net/item/epic-adv...

Monday, 1 June 2020

Planet of the Humans : Let's just have a think...

A well researched rebuttal of the leading arguments in the film Planet of the Humans.



On the 50th Anniversary of the first ever Earth Day, Jeff Gibbs and Michael Moore released a documentary film free on You Tube. The film is called Planet of the Humans, and it proved quite popular. This week we review the movie and consider its implications for climate activism. Read Bill McKibben's full response to the original film in Rolling Stone here : https://www.rollingstone.com/politics...

See a full bibliography of rebuttal articles here: http://getenergysmartnow.com/2020/04/... JHAT on Population Growth https://youtu.be/kVLp4-27LQw JHAT on Renewables Recycling https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLTJZ... JHAT on Palm Oil https://youtu.be/KTbPMODTey8 JHAT on BioMass https://youtu.be/6RP-jYDgiMg Help support and influence the growth of the Just Have a Think initiative here: http://www.patreon.com/justhaveathink Extra information received 11th May 2020 from Mike Bailey, one of the trustees of Solar Fest http://www.SolarFest.org "For accuracy, Roy Butler was slightly off in the date he suggested to you. Based on the music being performed, this was shot in 2006, not 2005. In 2006, and every year, power was banked to the grid for weeks prior to the festival, with the surplus contributed to the farm. For the ten years SolarFest was at Forget Me Not Farm, we ran a surplus covering all of our usage on a net meter basis. By 2008 the festival was run entirely on solar, including a permanent array with battery backup. Also we shifted to LEDs for the light show to reduce consumption and no longer relied on the grid." View research links from this video here: FILMS FOR ACTION STATEMENT https://www.filmsforaction.org/articl... KETAN JOSHI https://ketanjoshi.co/2020/04/29/this... https://ketanjoshi.co/2020/04/24/plan... ZEKE HAUSFATHER https://twitter.com/hausfath/status/1... CATHY COWAN BECKER https://medium.com/@cathycowanbecker/... LEAH STOKES https://www.vox.com/2020/4/28/2123859... https://twitter.com/leahstokes?ref_sr... GREG ALAVAREZ - American Wind Energy Council https://www.aweablog.org/fact-check-n... PFPI http://www.pfpi.net/the-eu-wants-to-k... SIERRA CLUB https://www.sierraclub.org/press-rele... https://addup.sierraclub.org IRENA https://www.irena.org/newsroom/pressr... https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/I... RICHARD YORK https://www.sciencedirect.com/science... UNITED NATIONS https://www.unenvironment.org/news-an... OUR WORLD IN DATA https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/sh... PROJECT DRAWDOWN https://www.drawdown.org/the-book TOM ATHANASIOU https://www.earthisland.org/journal/i... ELECTRIC VEHICLES https://www.forbes.com/sites/energyin... ADDENDUM: I said in the video "Forbes conceded ..." I have now learnt from another climate communicator, Adam Siegel, that this statement is a misleading representation of the motivation of the report's author. The cited/shown article was from one of Forbes online contributors called Silvio Marcacci. Silvio is a clean-energy communicator. His piece was spot on but it was not written in an attempt to 'represent' Forbes and I should not have used the phrase 'Forbes conceded'. Apologies to Silvio for this misrepresentation. https://www.nimblefins.co.uk/average-mpg https://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/... #planetofthehumans  #michaelmoore #jeffgibbs

Tuesday, 5 May 2020

Australian businesses call for climate crisis and virus economic recovery to be tackled together: The Guardian

Innes Willox, chief executive of the Australia Industry Group, says Covid-19 and climate are ‘urgent’ challenges that overlap.


A leading Australian business group is calling for the two biggest economic challenges in memory – recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic and cutting greenhouse gas emissions – to be addressed together, saying it would boost growth and put the country on a firm long-term footing.

Innes Willox, chief executive of the Australian Industry Group, representing more than 60,000 businesses, says economic recovery from the virus and the transition required to meet net-zero emissions by 2050 are overlapping issues that should be taken on together.

“There’s a lot that we can do to rebuild stronger and cleaner,” Willox planned to say on Tuesday, according to a speech released in advance.

“The need is urgent. Covid-19 and climate are bigger than any economic challenge we’ve faced in the last century.” 


Read the complete The Guardian article

Monday, 4 May 2020

NSW and Queensland coal industry uses as much water as all Sydney households, report finds: The Guardian

"The coal industry in New South Wales and Queensland is using as much water as all of Sydney’s households, according to new research.

A new report by University of Adelaide water resources academic Ian Overton, commissioned by the Australian Conservation Foundation, used public data to examine the impact of coal mining and coal-fired power on water resources.

It finds the amount of water consumed by coal mining and coal-fired power in NSW and Queensland is about 383bn litres a year, roughly equivalent to the household water needs of 5.2 million people."

........................................

Read the complete The Guardian article 

 ' “While farmers recover from the last devastating drought and prepare for the next, each year the coal industry uses as much freshwater as every household in Queensland or the entire population of Sydney,” she said.

“When you add coal-fired electricity’s water consumption and contamination to its climate pollution, it’s clear Australia should rapidly replace coal-fired power with clean energy.

“Becoming a modern renewable energy nation will enable us to weather future shocks and become a safer, more sustainable and resilient country.”  '

Monday, 30 March 2020

New research puts myth to bed: EVs will lower emissions: The DriveIn

New research has busted the myths around electric vehicles and emissions – confirming that in virtually every part of the world, including still coal-dominated Australia, switching to an electric vehicle will lead to lower greenhouse gas emissions.

The study, published in the journal Nature Sustainability, confirmed that in 95 per cent of the world, switching to an electric vehicle from a petrol equivalent would lead to an overall reduction in greenhouse emissions, even when the full life-cycle of a vehicle is taken into account.

There has been some conjecture over the emissions savings that could be achieved by a switch to an electric vehicle, with myths being pushed by the likes of climate contrarion Bjorn Lomborg in the Murdoch media that electric vehicles have no environmental benefits as they still may still source their electricity from fossil fuel power stations.

But the study, led by researchers from Radboud University in the Netherlands, working with the universities of Exeter and Cambridge, found that electric vehicles did indeed lead to lower emissions, even in regions where a large portion of electricity generation is sourced from fossil fuels.

Read more in the original article

Saturday, 28 March 2020

Cure for coronavirus-hit economy could be in renewables: Garnaut: Brisbane Times

"As Australia scrambles to avoid its first recession in three decades, economist Ross Garnaut says it is "exactly the right time" for government to throw cash into renewable energy infrastructure.

The global outbreak of COVID-19 has already taken a bite out of tourism, education and export industries, with the federal government working on a stimulus package to stave off a recession.
Professor Ross Garnaut says government should be investing in renewable energy.
Professor Ross Garnaut says government should be investing in renewable energy. Credit:Louie Douvis

Professor Garnaut said the country could not avoid sliding into a recession, but governments could "shape the way we come out of it".

"Even if there was no disruption in Australia from the virus, what has already happened to the economies of our major trading partners is deeply damaging to the Australian economy," he said, speaking at a CEDA lunch in Brisbane on Wednesday.
"The pure economics say right now is exactly the right time for major investment in the industries and infrastructure of the future."

"The high cost of transporting renewable energy overseas made Australia the perfect candidate to process its own iron, aluminium and other raw minerals, he said.

"Play it right and Australia has exceptional opportunities for new areas of prosperity and economic expansion in the zero-emissions world economy," he said."


Read the original Brisbane Times article

Tuesday, 24 March 2020

Small, modular wind farms

small vertical-axis wind turbines
Professor John Dabiri and his team have been conducting research for over 8 years on the potential of small vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) for wind farms. According to their data, by using the wind wakes that so drastically inflate the size of wind farms using horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs) constructively, rather than destructively, a VAWT farm could produce the same amount of power in 1/10th the land area, using turbines that are around 1/8th as tall. This has huge potential for industrial power production, as Dabiri et al rightfully point out, but I see an equal potential in a smaller niche: energy independence.

Read the original post

Photovoltaic solar panels (PVs) are currently the standard for community energy independence, from experimental ecovillages, to exploited areas such as Puerto Rico or Navajo Nation, to more privileged people looking to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels. This makes sense - even using the synergistic VAWT layout, solar still outperforms wind in power-per-area, assuming roughly equal reliability of wind and sun. PVs have a host of other problems, though, most notably a very high energy input, high cost, reliance on industrial production, and lots of intermittency from nighttime, clouds, and winter requiring large batteries. On the other hand, VAWTs can be built by the communities hoping to use them, potentially at very low cost in both energy and money, and run much more consistently through the night and the winter - potentially making up for the extra land area

While the synergistic VAWT layout is very efficient in terms of power-per-area, the one concern I have is power-per-turbine. A dynamo on each windmill could inflate the cost of the system quickly, and though smaller generators can be built from salvaged electric motors, the ideal turbine for this system is too large for any consumer washing machine or dryer motor and so finding enough motors could be tough. I believe the best solution to this would be mechanical transmission to a central generator, either through something like a jerker line or - my preferred idea - water pressure. Each turbine could run a mechanical pump, sending water through a series of pipes to run a single, large water wheel - which could either be salvaged from old industrial machinery or built by the community. This system could be incorporated into plumbing, welling, purification/desalination, etc. and could even be attached to a gravity battery system, pumping water upward when supply exceeds demand to be run back through the turbine when demand exceeds supply and thus solving the intermittency problem. A system like this would also be really easy to expand as needed
Of course, this kind of design isn’t a catch-all solution - nothing is. Areas with more reliable sunlight (such as tropical regions or deserts) and/or less reliable wind might benefit more from solar power, whereas communities with small enough energy demands to be provided by a single HAWT (like Open-Source Ecology’s design, for instance) wouldn’t have to deal with wakes at all, and thus could provide their power with only the space needed for its physical structure and access to the wind. I definitely think there are cases where synergistic VAWT clusters would be a great fit, though, and I hope this post inspires engineers, makers, and communities to start working on a robust, open-source design for such a system


Read the original post

Wednesday, 4 December 2019

Four Climate Change Investments Hiding in Plain Sight: Medium

There is a wealth of companies from which to choose

In my article Winning at Climate Change Investing, I broke down the different technology stages for companies involved in this business into Evolutionary Applications, Novel Adaptations, and Revolutionary Developments. I have written about a company that I believe to be just on the cusp between a Novel Adaptation and a Revolutionary Development: Carbon Engineering. Today, I wanted to focus my attention on a few companies in the Evolutionary Application category.

These are companies that are improving present products or processes to allow current systems to operate more efficiently.
One company at which I have been looking is Shiloh Industries SHLO. This is a small-cap name that focuses on material sciences and design changes to specialize in creating strong, lightweight auto components. While this may not strike you as a climate change related business, by decreasing the weight of automobiles, fuel-efficiency is improved for gas-powered vehicles and range increases for electric ones.

Tuesday, 29 October 2019

Morrison’s claim of an Australian gold in per capita renewables is not true: RenewEconomy

So long lump of coal. How good is Australia at renewable energy!

The PM repeated the claim back home later in Question Time, and like any good salesman, he challenged anyone to check it. So I did.

The PM’s renewable energy claim is false, even on his own sources."

Read the complete RenewEconomy story 

See also:

Does climate change make it immoral to have kids? : The Guardian

 

#criminales climรกticos de la cรกrcel

#criminalesclimรกticosdelacรกrcel

#jailclimatecriminals

#gaolclimatecriminals

Friday, 6 September 2019

Bernie Sanders Calls To Seize the Means of Electricity Production The presidential candidate’s new climate plan includes moving toward 100% public ownership of power.



"A year after a neglected Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) power line sparked a wildfire that tore through northern California, presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Thursday visited Chico, Calif., where many who fled the fire made a new home. He held a town hall the same day he released a new climate plan, in which he declared that the days of investor-owned utilities—with their profit incentives to underinvest in the electric grid and double down on fossil fuels—have to end.

He’s right: It is time for a massive public takeover of the nation’s electric grid.

The for-profit companies that reign over our energy system now have shown no meaningful sign of being willing to transform our energy system; they are much more interested in shareholder gains and business as usual. Together, for-profit utilities and fossil fuel companies have created powerful political-economic machines across the country to solidify the status quo of extraction and extortion. In contrast, democratic public ownership of our energy system could prioritize community benefit over profit, paving the way for a just and equitable energy system."

Go to In These Times story 

See also:

It’s Time to Try Fossil-Fuel Executives for Crimes Against Humanity: Jacobin

 

 See also:


 

Sunday, 18 August 2019

Clean Energy Produces Billions in Health Benefits, Study Finds : EcoWatch

States that invest heavily in renewable energy will generate billions of dollars in health benefits in the next decade instead of spending billions to take care of people getting sick from air pollution caused by burning fossil fuels, according to a new study from MIT and reported on by The Verge

In fact, 10 states across the Midwest could see massive savings. Ohio stands to gain $4.7 billion in health benefits by 2030 if they stick with their current renewable energy standards. The research shows that as states make their demands for renewalble energy more stringent, the health benefits and cost savings increase. 

Read the article in EcoWatch

See also:

Australia's PM Scott Morrison blasted by Pacific heat: The Guardian


Thursday, 11 July 2019

6 Glimmers of Climate Optimism for the End of a Dark Year: Medium

It was a year of frightening reports on the future of our planet. But sustainability experts are still feeling optimistic about some of the strides we’ve made this year.

The consensus among scientists, researchers, and sustainability experts following this years’ reports is that while stopping climate change will require an undoubtedly Herculean effort, the biggest hurdle is political, not technical. In other words, if all the innovations in sustainable technology and science were harnessed and directed at reducing emissions and environmental collapse, we might stand a chance at meeting the goals laid out in the reports.

Don’t get us wrong: It will take a heroic, global effort if we’re even going to come close to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius–the point after which, according to the reports, large swaths of the planet will become uninhabitable, and issues like mass starvation will become widespread. And the lack of leadership from the United States, under climate change denier Donald Trump, is making cohesive political action difficult.

But underneath all this, activists, scientists, and business leaders are
working to advance progressive climate action, and despite everything, have hung onto a sense of optimism as we move into 2019. Here are some reasons why:"


Related:

Restoring forests may be one of our most powerful weapons in fighting climate change: Vox

 


Tuesday, 14 May 2019

DESMOG: Renewables Offset 35 Times More CO2 Every Year Than All Carbon Capture Projects Ever, New Analysis Finds




By Justin Mikulka (6 min. read)
A new analysis by Clean Technica found that global investment in carbon capture and storage technology (CCS) adds up to roughly $7.5 billion total. It also examined how much, for that investment, CCS has reduced atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels compared to an equivalent investment in renewable power generation.

The analysis calculated that “wind and solar are displacing roughly 35 times as much CO2 every year as the complete global history of CCS.” Clean Technica's Mike Barnard concluded, “CCS is a rounding error in global warming mitigation.” 

Thursday, 18 April 2019

With Climate Losses Rising, Central Banks Push Greener Finance: Bloomberg

Weather related catastrophes are increasing
"The measures are aimed at building awareness about the potential losses as global temperatures increase, making storms more powerful and weather less predictable. It’s also seeking to encourage funding for greener projects that would reduce emissions and make renewables more affordable.


“If some companies and industries fail to adjust to this new world, they will fail to exist,” Carney and Villeroy said in a Guardian newspaper article on Wednesday. They warned that a “massive” reallocation of capital was necessary to prevent global warming, with the banking system playing a pivotal role."

Read the complete Bloomberg story 

See also:

Tuesday, 16 April 2019

Burning trees as climate mitigation: A resort to the Court: Euractive






"EU demand for wood pellets has increased forest harvesting for fuel, including clear-cutting fragile boreal forests in the EU and Canada, and wetland hardwood forests of the US South, write Jean-Pascal van Ypersele and Mary S. Booth. [McBeth / Flickr]
There is no debate that burning wood for energy emits more greenhouse gases per unit of energy than burning fossil fuels. Yet the EU’s renewable energy directive continues to uphold that burning forest wood is “carbon neutral,” write Jean-Pascal van Ypersele and Mary S. Booth.

Jean-Pascal van Ypersele is a climate scientist and professor at Universitรฉ Catholique de Louvain (UCL).  He is former vice-chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2008-2015). Mary S. Booth is the director at the Partnership for Policy Integrity (PPI), an organisation promoting science-based policies to protect air, water, ecosystems, and the climate.

As the UN’s International Day of Forests approaches (March 21), it’s a good time to focus on the role of forests in fighting climate change.

But given the obvious climate and ecosystem benefits of protecting and expanding forests, people might well ask, why does the EU’s flagship policy on climate, the new Renewable Energy Directive (REDII) promote logging and burning forests for energy?

This question lies at the heart of a suit filed this month in the Court of Justice of the European Union on behalf of six plaintiffs from the EU and the US.

The suit is necessary because the policy process, which should have protected people, ecosystems, and the climate, has failed. There is no debate that burning wood for energy emits more greenhouse gases per unit energy than burning fossil fuels.

And there is no debate that EU demand for wood pellet fuel has increased forest harvesting for fuel, including clear-cutting fragile boreal forests in the EU and Canada, and wetland hardwood forests of the US South."
 ............................................

EU dragged to court for backing forest biomass as ‘renewable energy’

A group of plaintiffs from Estonia, France, Ireland, Romania, Slovakia, Sweden, and the US are filing a lawsuit against the European Union on Monday (4 March) to challenge the inclusion of forest biomass in the bloc’s renewable energy directive.




Read Euractive article 

DISCLAIMER: All opinions in this column reflect the views of the author(s), not of EURACTIV.COM Ltd.

Saturday, 13 April 2019

The World's Poor are Hurt Not Helped by Fossil Fuel Subsidies : GMO

Vote for my climate
"Governments argue that fossil fuel subsidies are designed to help the poorest members of society, however, this is not borne out by the research.  The true beneficiaries of these subsidies are wealthier people and wealthier nations not the poor.
According to an IEA report, more than 85 percent of these subsidies go to middle and higher end income earners while only 8 percent of the aid is reaching the poorest 20 percent. These subsidies encourage energy consumption as people with the lowest incomes tend to be lower energy users and rarely drive.

"Fossil-fuel subsidies as presently constituted tend to be regressive, disproportionately benefiting higher income groups that can afford higher levels of fuel consumption," the report said. 'Social welfare programs are a more effective and less distortionary way of helping the poor than energy subsidies.' "


Read the Green Market Oracle story

#fossil fuel subsidies   #climate catastrophe  #poverty   #renewable energy  #100% renewable energy  #electricity #Australia

Sunday, 7 April 2019

What’s with the UK’s ‘boneheaded’ energy policy?: Medium

climate criminals

"Lobbies and the Military are pushing the UK to favour fracking and nuclear energy over renewables."

“ 'England’s energy policy is very opportunistic, there is no long-term vision,” says Duncan Connors, an economics and energy policy specialist at Durham University. The idea that there is money to be made short-term in shale gas is what underpins government policy, he says. “In the long run, renewables will also bring in a lot of money, but that doesn’t fit into their frame of vision.' ”
climate emergency

"For now, there is still a limit to wind and solar energy: the need to store energy to compensate for uneven weather conditions. Kirby argues that this “isn’t a real problem,” in a few years, there will be batteries powerful enough to store the surplus energy and retransmit it. “The smart thing to do now would be to invest resources into conducting research into making these storage options a reality,” he says. In the UK, Green energy gets twelve times less R&D funding from the government than nuclear power."



#renewables  #UK   #UnitedKingdom  #shalegas   #methane   #batterystorage   #fracking

Wednesday, 3 April 2019

Florida chooses world’s largest solar + storage project to replace gas plants: Renew Economy


"Florida Power & Light (FPL), the state utility owned by NextEra Energy, plans to build the world’s largest solar plus battery storage project which will boast battery capacity four times larger than anything currently in operation.

The new project is specifically intended to accelerate the retirement and replacement of two 1970s-era natural gas generating units at the company’s neighbouring power plant."

Read the article

Saturday, 30 March 2019

Australia’s plunging wind, solar, storage costs stun fossil fuel industry: Renew Economy


"This week the federal Coalition government decided to dump 90 per cent of the coal projects that had been submitted to its big underwriting program, and chose instead a shortlist dominated by renewables backed by battery storage and pumped hydro, and some gas and just one coal upgrade.


The choice may have been driven more by politics than economics, given the project developers were asked for only a broad outline of their proposal and there is an election just a few weeks away.


But when the final detailed tenders come in later this year – assuming the program survives the upcoming election campaign – the economic case for favouring renewables and storage projects should be crystal clear, if the latest numbers from global analysts BloombergNEF are anything to go by.

The stunning fall in the costs of wind, solar and storage – estimated on a global scale – has already put the fossil fuel industry on notice, as we reported earlier this week."

Read the article 

See also: The Age of Stupid

#coal  #coalgeneratedenergy  #electricity   #renewableenergy  #renewableenergy