Showing posts with label methane gas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label methane gas. Show all posts

Wednesday, 8 June 2022

Australia's total coal mine methane emissions double official estimates, Ember report finds (Excerpt): ABC News

A map of Australia showing coal mining areas in Queensland and New South Wales where methane leaks have been detected.
This map shows the coal mines emitting the most methane in the country.(Supplied: Ember)
Australia's methane emissions from coal mines are twice as high as national estimates, with some mines leaking up to 10 times more methane than officially reported, research by an international climate think tank has found.

European-based researcher Ember was commissioned by the environmental group, Lock the Gate Alliance, to analyse available data on methane emissions from the Australian Greenhouse Emissions Information System (AGEIS), the Clean Energy Regulator (CER), the Australian Chief Economist, Department of Natural Resources and Mines, the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Global Energy Monitor.

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas and its global warming potential is more than 25 times that of carbon dioxide.

The report found that in 2019, Australian coal mine methane emissions made up 68 per cent of overall energy industry emissions, making it a bigger contributor than oil and gas.

"That's a really massive climate impact before we even start to think about the carbon dioxide emissions released from burning coal."

By ABC national regional reporter Nathan Morris

Go to complete ABC News report

Thursday, 18 March 2021

Opinion: No gas-led recovery thanks, we need clean energy : Excerpt from BCS

 "The Morrison-McCormack government is planning a massive expansion of the gas industry as a way to recover from COVID-19. However, a gas-led recovery is not the way to go. It's the way to lock Australia into a climate-destroying, fossil-fueled disaster.

A recovery should, if the science is respected as it is with COVID, transition Australia to 100 per cent clean energy, create thousands of clean jobs, boost the economy, and bring Australia's emissions down. A recovery that would make Australia a renewable energy superpower.

Despite the scientific, economic and health evidence that we must decarbonise rapidly, the government is planning a vast increase in fossil fuels. They have no plan to transition away from coal, and no plan to close down coal-fired power stations, although they will anyway because they are getting old.

There are a staggering 22 new gas projects, starting with three vast areas - the Beetaloo Basin in the Territory, and the North Bowen and Galilee Basins in Queensland. In NSW, there are plans for enormous volumes of gas to be extracted just off the coastline between Newcastle and Sydney."

Read the complete Bellingen Courier Sun Opinion piece by Harry Creamer.

Thursday, 19 November 2020

NO FUTURE IN GAS - video

"Renewables provide the cheapest source of energy and are creating the energy jobs of the present AND the future.

Yet, our State (Victorian) Government has given the go ahead to open up polluting gas fields and a mega gas import terminal that will have little to no impact on our gas bills but a huge impact on our climate. To cut power prices, we need to invest in renewables and help get Brunswick and Victoria off gas. Download our fact sheet here. 

Didn't know there was a problem with gas? Watch this video." 

Dr Tim Read - Greens MP


Friday, 13 November 2020

The 40 Things Biden Should Do First on Climate Change (excerpt): Bloomberg Green

 

Randolph Bell
Randolph Bell, Director for Global Energy Security, Atlantic Council

Take care of fugitive methane emissions.

“Failing to fully address methane leakage is increasingly a risk for the climate and for the U.S. economy. Methane makes up at least 10 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions—recent analysis suggests far more—and is at least 25% more potent at trapping heat than carbon dioxide. With natural gas projected to play an important role in the global energy system even under aggressive decarbonization scenarios by providing low-carbon power in the developing world and feedstock for hydrogen production (with carbon capture and storage), addressing methane is crucial for meeting climate goals.”

“The U.S.’s methane problem has the attention of major oil & gas producers, who decried the Trump Administration’s August reversal of an Obama-era rule on methane. Engie’s decision last month, under pressure from the French government, to delay its $7 billion deal with U.S. LNG company NextDecade because of U.S. methane emissions underscores the risks to the U.S. economy.”

“President-elect Biden can immediately direct the EPA to initiate a new rulemaking process to ensure that industry monitors and addresses leaks in new equipment, as Obama’s rule did. Biden can also be more ambitious and address leaks in older equipment, an effort that was not completed under Obama.” —As told to Akshat Rathi
 
 

Saturday, 17 October 2020

How the world’s biggest emitter could be carbon neutral by 2050 (excerpts): Vox

 "China’s road to net-zero emissions

The new study contains many significant recommendations; key among them is the timeline for China’s decarbonization.

When Xi Jinping announced the goal of carbon neutrality by 2060, it was broadly interpreted to refer to carbon dioxide, the main gas driving global warming, and not other greenhouse gases, like methane or nitrous oxide. But the researchers suggest otherwise, saying China should reach net-zero for all greenhouse gases by 2060, and net-zero for carbon dioxide by 2050.

In his presentation of the results on Monday, He Jiankun, a Tsinghua professor and climate expert who co-led the study, said his understanding is that Xi’s goal of “carbon neutrality” by 2060 was referring to all greenhouse gases. An expert source told China Dialogue that this interpretation shouldn’t be understood as the official government stance until it is further clarified. But if official, it would mean China would have to cut emissions more rapidly over the coming decades.

The research also shows what net-zero emissions might look like for the world’s top emitter. Under their net-zero emissions scenario, the researchers propose almost entirely replacing fossil fuels with clean energy in the electricity sector, leaving coal power at less than 5 percent of power generation — a massive drop from the almost 70 percent coal supplied in 2019." .....

.................

.... "What to watch for in the coming year

Although this new study has strong backing from people with connections to the highest levels of government, its place in China’s official plans will be clearer when China submits its “mid-century strategy,” a document that all signatories of the Paris Agreement are requested to complete by the end of 2020 to chart out long-term decarbonization. (China is expected to release this document sometime in the next few months.)

As for more immediate decision-making, the study authors also recommend that China upgrade its climate and energy targets under the Paris Agreement and in its five-year plan. China’s carbon emissions are still growing — last year saw a 2 percent increase — so the authors advise that the next five-year plan set a hard cap on carbon emissions at 10.5 billion tons. As for setting new Paris Agreement targets this year, one key recommendation is to up the 2030 target from 20 percent non-fossil fuel energy generation to 25 percent to speed China’s renewable energy build-out.

Whether China adopts these upgraded targets in the coming months will be a first real indication of how and when the country plans to get to net zero."

Go to Vox article

Related: A nine-point plan for the UK to achieve net zero carbon emissions (excerpts): Guardian

 

China,methane gas,carbon capture,trees,coal,Paris Agreement,#climate crisis,#climatechange, #wewantclimateactionnow

Saturday, 19 September 2020

More natural gas isn’t a “middle ground” — it’s a climate disaster (excerpt): Vox

To tackle climate change, natural gas has got to go.

 
Methane gas energy has to go. Leave gas in the ground.

"Methane leakage may make natural gas as bad as coal, but it’s not the reason gas has no future

The paper leads with a quick note on methane leakage in natural gas production. Methane is a fast-acting greenhouse gas with enormous short-term impacts on climate. It leaks at every stage of the natural gas production and transportation process.

While gas itself is less carbon-intensive than coal, if enough methane leaks during its production, its greenhouse gas advantages are wiped out.

Gas wells destroy farmland.
Does that much methane leak? Some studies have suggested that, yes, methane leakage is bad enough to make natural gas the greenhouse equivalent of coal. Other studies have suggested that gas still has an advantage (and proponents note that leakage could be reduced).

For our purposes here, it doesn’t matter. None of the five arguments against natural gas rely on any particular estimate of leakage. All of them would apply even if natural gas achieved zero leakage (which is impossible). The same is true regarding the local environmental impacts of natural gas production (air pollution, habitat loss, earthquakes) — they are dreadful, but even if they were eliminated, the following arguments would still apply.


1) Gas breaks the carbon budget

Honestly, this one is enough to rule out gas on its own. .......... "

Read the complete Vox article by

  Revealed: how the gas industry is waging war against climate action (excerpt) : The Guardian

 

Fact check on PM Morrison's gas plan.

 

 #methanegas,methane gas,greenhouse gas pollution,carbon dioxide,#economy,#stranded assets,#renewables,#jailclimatecriminals,

 

Saturday, 22 August 2020

Revealed: how the gas industry is waging war against climate action (excerpt) : The Guardian


Gas is one of the biggest drivers of emissions growth both in the US and globally
Methane gas contributes to climate change
"After the gas ban was beaten back in Seattle, Caleb Heeringa, a spokesman for the Sierra Club in the city, said advocates saw coordinated industry and union pushback against gas-related climate efforts grow.

A new group called the Partnership for Energy Progress (PEP) was taking root. The partnership is an organization of western utilities, labor unions and businesses that plans to spend $2.8m in 2020 convincing consumers that “natural gas is part of a clean energy future”, and fighting state and local climate restrictions on gas, according to records reviewed by the Guardian."

Gas is one of the biggest drivers of emissions growth both in the US and globally
Methane gas well. They leak.
.................

"The American Gas Association (AGA), which represents mainly investor-owned gas providers, now convenes monthly calls “that bring together appliance, homebuilder, fuel, and other associations to compare notes and support efforts to push back on decarbonization and electrification issues”, according to the same document."

Gas is one of the biggest drivers of emissions growth both in the US and globally
Communities say no to gas wells.
........................

"As the public learns more about the harms of natural gas, the industry is playing both defense and offense.

Burning natural gas produces less planet-heating carbon dioxide than burning coal or oil. Gas advocates have positioned it as a smart alternative to those dirtier fossil fuels. Even the Obama administration backed gas as a “bridge fuel”.

But the extraction and transportation of natural gas leaks methane: a climate pollutant with a short-term warming potential far more powerful than carbon dioxide. Scientists are revealing we have greatly underestimated the methane emitted by the gas industry.
Fossil gas is responsible for 42% of the US greenhouse gas emissions that come from burning fossil fuels, according to data from the Department of Energy interpreted by Robert Howarth, who researches methane at Cornell University.
Gas is one of the biggest drivers of emissions growth both in the US and globally
#jailclimatecriminals

“Gas is one of the biggest drivers of emissions growth both in the US and globally, and the future trends for expansion on the system are really worrying,” said Sheryl Carter, director of the power sector climate program at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “The infrastructure investments that are being made right now … they last for 40 to 60 years. So that really locks in those emissions increases.”"

Read the complete The Guardian story 

Related: What Can I Do? The Truth About Climate Change and How to Fix It by Jane Fonda
Published August 20, 2020 

#jailclimatecriminals, greenhouse gas pollution, methane gas, #America, #Australia, #climate crisis, #climateaction, #climatecriminals, #economy, 

Wednesday, 12 August 2020

Trump EPA Plan to Gut Emission Rules for Oil and Gas Industry Denounced as 'Beyond Comprehension': Common Dreams


Vote out Trump for the planet's sake.
Your taxes funding fossil fuels
"If Trump is reelected and this rule sticks, it is probably the single most consequential near-term climate decision of his presidency."
by
In a move one green group said shows the Trump EPA's approach is "manifestly inconsistent with the agency's legal obligations" and with science, the agency is under fire for preparations to roll back methane rules for U.S. oil and gas producers.

Before Friday, the New York Times reported, the EPA is expected to unveil two new rules regarding methane, a greenhouse gas with 80 times the heat-trapping power of carbon dioxide in the first two decades after emission.

One would eliminate federal regulation of methane emissions from oil and gas wells across the country and would prevent future regulation at sites built before 2015, and another would weaken remaining requirements for companies, including one directing them to locate and fix leaks in wells. 

With the new rules in place, meteorologist and climate reporter Eric Holthaus said, voting Trump out of office in November will be imperative to protect communities across the country from methane emissions, which the EPA itself has said are linked to premature death, stroke, chronic bronchitis, and low birth weight as well as the warming of the planet. 

Read the complete Common Dreams article

Related:  Fossil Fuel Workers Deserve Better: Video



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And in Mandarin:

为这个星球投票选出特朗普。
您的税款为化石燃料提供资金

“如果特朗普再次当选并且坚持这一规则,这可能是他担任总统期间最重要的近期气候决定。”
通过
朱莉娅·康利(Julia Conley),特约作家
 

一个绿色组织在一项举动中表示,特朗普EPA的做法“明显违背了该机构的法律义务”,
并且与科学相抵,该机构正着手准备撤消美国石油和天然气生产商的甲烷法规。

 

据《纽约时报》报道,周五之前,预计美国环保署将发布两项有关甲烷的新规定。
甲烷是一种温室气体,其排放后的头二十年内的二氧化碳的集热能力是其的80倍。

 

一种将取消联邦对全国油气井的甲烷排放的监管,并阻止未来在2015年之前建造的场所进行监管,
另一种将削弱对公司的剩余要求,包括指示公司定位和修复井中的泄漏。

 

有了新规定,气象学家和气候记者埃里克·霍尔特豪斯(Eric Holthaus)表示,
必须在11月投票给特朗普,以保护全国各地的居民免受甲烷排放的威胁,
而美国环保署本身已将其与过早死亡,中风,慢性病联系在一起。支气管炎,低出生体重以及地球的变暖。

 

阅读完整的《共同梦想》文章
 
 
Wèi zhège xīngqiú tóupiào xuǎn chū tè lǎng pǔ.
Nín de shuì kuǎn wèi huàshí ránliào tígōng zījīn

“rúguǒ tè lǎng pǔ zàicì dāngxuǎn bìngqiě jiānchí zhè yī guīzé, 
zhè kěnéng shì tā dānrèn zǒngtǒng qíjiān zuì zhòngyào de jìnqí qìhòu juédìng.”
Tōngguò
zhūlìyà·kānglì (Julia Conley), tèyuē zuòjiā
 

yīgè lǜsè zǔzhī zài yī xiàng jǔdòng zhōng biǎoshì, 
tè lǎng pǔ EPA de zuòfǎ “míngxiǎn wéibèile gāi jīgòu de fǎlǜ yìwù”, 
bìngqiě yǔ kēxué xiāngdǐ, gāi jīgòu zhèng zháo shǒu zhǔnbèi chèxiāo měiguó 
shíyóu hé tiānránqì shēngchǎn shāng de jiǎwán fǎguī.

 

Jù “niǔyuē shíbào” bàodào, zhōu wǔ zhīqián, 
yùjì měiguó huánbǎo shǔ jiāng fābù liǎng xiàng yǒuguān jiǎwán de xīn guīdìng. 
Jiǎwán shì yī zhǒng wēnshì qìtǐ, qí páifàng hòu de tóu èrshí niánnèi de èryǎnghuàtàn 
de jí rè nénglì shì qí de 80 bèi.

 

Yī zhǒng jiāng qǔxiāo liánbāng duì quánguó yóuqì jǐng de jiǎwán páifàng de jiānguǎn, 
bìng zǔzhǐ wèilái zài 2015 nián zhīqián jiànzào de chǎngsuǒ jìnxíng jiānguǎn, 
lìng yī zhǒng jiāng xuēruò duì gōngsī de shèngyú yāoqiú, 
bāokuò zhǐshì gōngsī dìngwèi hé xiūfù jǐngzhōng de xièlòu.

 

Yǒule xīn guīdìng, qìxiàng xué jiā hé qìhòu jìzhě āi lǐ 
kè·huò ěr tè háo sī (Eric Holthaus) biǎoshì, bìxū zài 11 yuè tóupiào gěi tè lǎng pǔ, 
yǐ bǎohù quánguó gèdì de jūmín miǎn shòu jiǎwán páifàng de wēixié, 
ér měiguó huánbǎo shǔ běnshēn yǐ jiāng qí yǔguò zǎo sǐwáng, zhòngfēng, 
mànxìngbìng liánxì zài yīqǐ. Zhīqìguǎn yán, dī chūshēng tǐzhòng yǐjí dìqiú 
de biàn nuǎn.

 

Yuèdú wánzhěng de “gòngtóng mèngxiǎng” wénzhāng

Friday, 31 July 2020

New gas-fired power not needed as renewable energy expands, grid operator says : The Guardian

#jailclimatecriminals  #climatechange
A day in 2014: Renewable Energy
 A roadmap for an optimal electricity market suggests gas prices will need to stay low to compete with alternatives on renewable grid.


New gas-fired power is not essential for a grid increasingly based on renewable energy, and gas prices will need to stay low if it is to compete with alternatives, according to the government agency responsible for the electricity system.

a range of “dispatchable” power sources that can be turned on and off when needed.
Solar Power is cheaper
The Australian Energy Market Operator (Aemo) has released a roadmap detailing what an optimal national electricity market would look like to 2040 if it was designed with a focus on security, reliability and the lowest cost for consumers.

Its integrated system plan, the result of 18 months consultation and analysis, describes a diverse system built on large and small-scale renewable energy supported by a range of “dispatchable” power sources that can be turned on and off when needed.

Read the complete The Guardian article

Related:

Australian Government sued by 23-year-old Melbourne student over financial risks of climate change: ABC NEWS

 

methane gas, greenhouse gases, energy plan, energy storage, 

#jailclimatecriminals, #Australia, #cambio-climatico, #climatechange, #economy, 

 

Thursday, 16 July 2020

Fracking Firms Fail, Rewarding Executives and Raising Climate Fears: NYT

Oil and gas companies are hurtling toward bankruptcy, raising fears that wells will be left leaking planet-warming pollutants, with cleanup costs left to taxpayers.





Credit...Jonah M. Kessel/The New York Times



The day the debt-ridden Texas oil producer MDC Energy filed for bankruptcy eight months ago, a tank at one of its wells was furiously leaking methane, a potent greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere. As of last week, dangerous, invisible gases were still spewing into the air.


Monday, 22 June 2020

Government's COVID Commission manufacturing plan calls for huge public gas subsidies: ABC NEWS

methane gas industry calls for sunsidies
State bans on coal seam gas development would be scrapped and the Federal Government would underwrite gas prices and massively subsidise costs and investment for gas companies, under confidential plans for a "gas-led manufacturing recovery" post-COVID-19.

The draft plans, obtained by the ABC, call for the scrapping of "green and red tape" on gas development, including a relaxation of Australian standards for equipment used in gas infrastructure and a loosening of environmental regulations and approval processes.

They are set out in an interim report from the manufacturing taskforce of the National COVID Coordination Commission (NCCC).

The NCCC is a hand-picked team of business leaders and former bureaucrats set up by the Prime Minister's Office to shape the economic recovery from the virus and lockdown, and includes several members with strong links to the gas sector.

The manufacturing taskforce includes business representatives as well as union leaders from that sector.

Its draft report advocates "underwriting new [gas] supply with government balance sheets" to allow gas producers "to invest with confidence and new pipelines to be built to get the gas to markets".


Read the ABC NEWS article

Monday, 8 June 2020

Banking on gas will leave us stranded: SMH

#climatecrisis   #jailclimatecriminals
Covid-19 pandemic
"When I, and others, proposed gas as a transition fuel some 30 years ago, the price of solar was multiples of its current price, so gas was a quicker and more cost-effective means of achieving a reduction in emissions of some 40 to 60 per cent relative to coal.

However, as Chief Scientist Alan Finkel admitted in his recent address to the National Press Club, “the cost of producing electricity from wind and solar is now around $A50 per megawatt hour and [even with effective storage] the price … is lower than existing gas-fired electricity generation and similar to new-build, coal-fired electricity generation … and is set to drop even further”.

And with solar and wind technology proven, in the sense that financiers accept the risk without premium, why wouldn’t the government seek the development of grid-scale storage to achieve 100 per cent renewables? Clearly Morrison and his team have sold out to the likes of the Minerals Council and the fossil fuel lobby, whose influence is now conspicuous in the focus of the COVID recovery commission."




Read the complete SMH article 


Chief Scientist Dr Alan Finkel says gas fired hydrogen could reduce the risk associated with total reliance on renewable energy.

The suggestion of a pipeline linking large the gas fields off

Friday, 5 June 2020




The Australien Government has made an ad about its Economic Recovery Plan, and it’s surprisingly honest and informative.

 👉 Take action: https://www.thejuicemedia.com/derp 

👉 Ways you can support us to keep making videos: 

🔹 Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/TheJuiceMedia 🔹 Tip us on PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/thejuicemedia 

👉 CREDITS 🔹 Produced by Patrons of The Juice Media 🔹 Written and directed by Giordano for The Juice Media 🔹 Performed by Ellen Burbidge x Voice by Lucy 🔹 Gas and Volcano animations by Brent Cataldo: https://twitter.com/yahtzio 🔹 Script feedback and input: Dbot, Scott, Adso, Damian, Simon 🔹 Research Assistance by Rebecca Clarke 🔹 Research Assistance by Mara, Megan & Cam @ Friends of the Earth 🔹 Music by TwinsMusic: https://audiojungle.net/item/upbeat-i... 🔹 Outro music by Triple7Music: https://audiojungle.net/item/epic-adv...

Monday, 25 May 2020

Gas lobby seizes Covid moment, and declares war on Australia’s future: RenewEconomy

And so it is with the extraordinary attack launched on Australia’s future by its incumbent fossil fuel industry, and the gas lobby in particular. Its casus belli is the Covid-19 pandemic, and the fossil fuel industry has been enabled to do this after being invited by the Morrison regime to do more or less at it pleases and design its own future.

The reach and sheer audacity of the proposals unveiled over the past week is extraordinary, and the lasting impact on Australia’s future may dwarf anything that Tony Abbott and his Far Right cheerleaders may have done; notwithstanding his white-anting of the Carbon Pollution Reductions Scheme more than a decade ago, the scrapping of the carbon price in 2014 and the unceasing campaign against science and engineering.

This is the critical decade. Scientists tell us, repeatedly and with a near unanimous voice, that serious emissions reductions must be achieved in the next 10 years if the world is to flatten the emissions curve and give itself half a chance of capping average global warming at less than 2°C. A target of 1.5°C may already be out of reach.

Australia finds itself at a critical juncture. It benefits from the stunning cost reductions in solar, wind and battery storage, and key institutions have mapped out a path to a high renewable energy grid. Experts are shining the light on a future of green manufacturing and “green energy exports” that could enhance the position of the country as a significant energy superpower.
But the fossil fuel industry and its backers, with their focus almost entirely on short-term profits and ideological claptrap, have other ideas. They have decided to throw a live grenade into Australia’s own economic bunker, and its environment, and put the future of the current and emerging generation at risk.

Consider the list of what has emerged from the government-appointed gas-industry led reviews in the past week, including the King Review, the Covid Commission, the technology investment roadmap, and from the intense pressure being put on energy regulators.


– Bastardising the remit of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency in an attempt to to force them to invest away from renewable and smart and enabling technologies and into gas and carbon capture and storage

– Polluting the already controversial and ineffective Climate Solutions Fund by creating a “base-line” that industry experts suggest will allow big polluters to increase their emissions and get paid for doing so.'

– Delaying critical energy market rule changes and reforms that might have encouraged smart new technologies such as battery storage and demand management, and end the rorting of the current system by incumbent coal, gas and hydro generators.

– Pushing the case for gas and CCS in a “technology investment roadmap” that otherwise clearly identifies wind, solar, storage and other technologies such as EVs, heat pumps, energy efficiency and demand management as the cheapest and most reliable options.

However, none of these quite reaches the breadth, depth and cynicism of the so-called Covid-Commission, which appears entirely possessed with the narrow interests of the gas industry, from where many of these commissioners have emerged.


Read more of this Renew Economy story

Monday, 14 October 2019

Blame for Extinction Spreads to Methane Gas: NYT

"Two hundred million years ago, at the end of the Triassic period, a mass extinction, often attributed to major volcanic activity, wiped out half of all marine life on Earth. But new research published in the journal Science suggests that the extinction was more likely to have been caused by the release of at least 12,000 gigatons of methane from the seafloor into the atmosphere."

"Dr. Ruhl and his colleagues studied carbon isotopes of sediments from the period and found that the extinction event coincided with the giant release of methane into the atmosphere.
Volcanoes still played in a role in the process, Dr. Ruhl said.

“There was a release of CO2 from volcanic eruptions that warmed up global temperatures and also the ocean,” he said. “Methane is only stable under certain temperatures. If it gets warm, it is released.”

The study could be foreshadowing the effect of climate change on Earth, Dr. Ruhl said. An increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from fossil-fuel use could warm up the planet enough to release methane from the ocean floors, he said."

Read the NYT article

Saturday, 3 August 2019

Just 10% of fossil fuel subsidy cash 'could pay for green transition' : The Guardian

"Switching just some of the huge subsidies supporting fossil fuels to renewables would unleash a runaway clean energy revolution, according to a new report, significantly cutting the carbon emissions that are driving the climate crisis.

Coal, oil and gas get more than $370bn (£305bn) a year in support, compared with $100bn for renewables, the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) report found. Just 10-30% of the fossil fuel subsidies would pay for a global transition to clean energy, the IISD said."

Link to The Guardian article 


Related:

Coalition's emissions reduction fund labelled 'a joke' after first post-election auction


Related: Can planting trees save our climate?

 


Tuesday, 23 July 2019

Major U.S. cities are leaking methane (Natural Gas) at twice the rate previously believed

Natural gas, long touted as a cleaner burning alternative to coal, has a leakage problem. A new study has found that leaks of methane, the main ingredient in natural gas and itself a potent greenhouse gas, are twice as big as official tallies suggest in major cities along the U.S. eastern seaboard. The study suggests many of these fugitive leaks come from homes and businesses—and could represent a far bigger problem than leaks from the industrial extraction of the fossil fuel itself.

“This is an issue that people tend to ignore when trying to estimate methane emissions,” says Kathryn McKain, an atmospheric scientist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, who wasn’t involved in the new research. When compared with the global amount of natural and human-driven methane emissions, she notes, “These emissions are small, but they’re preventable.”

Read the ScienceMag article

Monday, 8 July 2019

Climate change: what to expect and are there really two sides? | Ask Bob: Video




Published on Nov 4, 2017

Many view climate change as the most pressing issue of our time. But how, specifically, is it going to affect us and our planet? Is there still time to make a difference? And what does it mean to believe "both sides" of climate change science? CBC's Bob McDonald weighs-in.

Related:

How high will sea levels rise- ABC Science